Commit Graph
109 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
dc b41402b1d3 chore(ci): run the mocked estate on 3.12.2
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 5m11s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 7s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 8s
3.12.2 is the current release and carries the packaged-executable fix for
/ddc-host (the page this job's va-ddc-host spec drives), so the version the
tests run against is the version that ships. 3.12.0 remains the floor for
`timing=early`.
2026-11-03 20:08:58 +00:00
dc 40d1424a53 ci(embed): run va-ddc-host in CI, on a server that has timing=early
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 6m37s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 10m22s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 27m27s
Closes #449.

- SASJS_SERVER_VERSION 3.6.2 -> 3.12.1 in build.yaml. 3.12.0 is the floor:
  /ddc-host with `timing=early` (the replay that lands before the app
  bootstraps) arrived there, and it is absent from 3.11.3, which has no
  /ddc-host at all.
- DDC_HOST_ENABLED=true in the job's .env. The server 404s /ddc-host unless it
  is set - it is a testing tool and does not announce itself - so enabling the
  spec without this would have failed on the first case.
- va-ddc-host moves from EXCLUDED to the END of SPECS in cypress-specs.sh: it
  clears the DC_JSLIB filter tables before each case, so it must run last on the
  shared mock estate. The ordering contract at the top of that file now records
  that, and metanav's licence key, which no longer has to avoid being last
  itself.
2026-11-03 19:42:25 +00:00
dc 9d40fc56df ci: decide "run the suite" on every failure path, and cover .gitea/scripts
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 5m44s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 9m0s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 29m54s
Review findings on the change-detection steps and the shared build artefact.

- A failed fetch or diff in "Detect client changes" used to fail the job: the
  fail-safe only covered an output that was absent, not a step that errored.
  Both workflows now exit 0 without writing client=false on any failure, so an
  undecidable change set runs the suite instead of blocking the pull request.
- .gitea/scripts/ joins the change set in both workflows: it carries the spec
  list (cypress-specs.sh) and the runner gate (check-runner-memory.sh), so a
  change to what the suite runs, or to the gate that lets it run, must run it.
- A skipped job now says so in a named step and a notice annotation, rather than
  reporting success from a list of greyed-out steps.
- The dist upload sets if-no-files-found: error, so an empty artefact fails the
  producing job instead of surfacing later as "webSourcePath ... doesn't exist".
- lighthouserc.js records the cost of numberOfRuns: 1 - no median, so one slow
  navigation is a re-run rather than a fix.
2026-11-03 19:13:08 +00:00
dc 3aae36f94d ci: stop paying for the same build, run and audit three times per PR
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 6m43s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 10m58s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 27m23s
Measured over the last 150 workflow runs on this forge: a pull request costs
56 runner-minutes (Build-and-ng-test 5.8m, Build-and-test-development 31.2m,
lighthouse 19.3m), and when three pull requests are in flight the first job
queues 47-69 minutes before it starts.

- Build-and-ng-test publishes client/dist as an artifact and the Cypress job
  downloads it instead of running a second cold `npm run build` (1.6m each).
  Both jobs test the same bytes.
- lighthouse: numberOfRuns 1 (lhci's default of 3 tripled the 13.6m audit to
  steady a median that only has to clear a fixed threshold), and the duplicate
  /view/usernav/groups entry is removed (17 unique URLs, not 18).
- Cypress records no video in CI and takes screenshots on failure instead
  (`--config video=false,screenshotOnRunFailure=true`, CLI only so local runs
  and the demo recorder still record); the failure artifact carries
  screenshots as well as any video.
- Both workflows detect whether client/ or sas/mocks/ changed and skip their
  expensive steps when neither did - a sas-only or docs-only pull request no
  longer pays 45 minutes for suites that cannot observe it. The gate is
  `!= 'false'`, so a missing step output runs the suite rather than quietly
  reporting green.
2026-11-03 14:03:58 +00:00
dc ab4f4c9b60 ci: fail a client job fast on a runner too small for it
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 6m25s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 19m12s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 35m37s
An undersized runner does not fail honestly: the kernel OOM killer takes
the build, so the job reports exitcode 137 at ng build, or Karma
disconnects mid-suite after twenty minutes. Both read as a flaky test
rather than as a box that cannot hold the job, and both cost a whole CI
slot.

The check runs first in the three client jobs (Build-and-ng-test,
Build-and-test-development, lighthouse), prints total and available RAM,
vCPU count and any cgroup limit, and exits 1 when the effective size is
under 8 GB - the supported minimum. A cold production build measures
3.8 GB peak on its own, so 8 GB leaves roughly 2x headroom.
2026-11-01 15:47:48 +00:00
dc c8c0858295 fix(lint): make noUnusedMacros an error and clear its 54 findings
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 5m45s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 21m2s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 31m7s
sas/.sasjslint now promotes noUnusedMacros to "error", so the rule fails
the build rather than printing a warning. The 54 findings it reported are
gone:

- 46 header entries nothing calls are dropped. Each removal was checked
  against the compiled artefacts rather than the linter alone: the
  project was compiled before and after, and the two sasjsbuild trees
  compared. 37 macro definitions disappear from the generated programs -
  every one of them either a duplicate of a definition the file still
  reaches through another declared macro, or a macro no generated program
  calls. No macro that a generated program calls lost its definition.
- 8 entries are kept, in five files that carry
  @sasjslint {"noUnusedMacros": false} with the reason written above it:
  the three serviceInit programs and serviceterm.sas declare mpeinit and
  mpeterm without calling them, because that declaration is how a service
  body reaches those macros at all; loadfile.sas declares mp_binarycopy
  for the fallback that is commented out on SAS 9.4 and later.
- Four headers are left with no macros to declare, so their empty
  <h4> SAS Macros </h4> section is removed rather than kept as a stub.

@sasjs/cli is bumped 6.2.0 -> 6.5.0 in sas/package.json. The lint engine
ships inside the CLI and is not a direct dependency, so the pinned CLI is
what fixes the rule set: 6.2.0 resolves @sasjs/lint 4.3.0, 6.5.0 pins
4.9.0 exactly. Both versions were compiled against this tree and the
sasjsbuild output is byte-identical, so the bump changes the lint engine
and nothing else.

`sasjs lint` is also now reachable as `npm run lint:sas`, and a CI step in
build.yaml runs it. Until now nothing ran SAS lint automatically, and a
bare `sasjs` resolves whatever CLI is installed globally - a different
lint version reports a different rule set, which is why the counts in
issue #376 (taken with 6.2.5) do not match the pinned 6.2.0.

43 warnings remain under the rules not yet promoted: noUndeclaredMacros
(25), noBannedStrings (13), macro name length and case (4),
indentationMultiple (1). They are the next rungs of the ratchet.

The pre-commit Prettier gate could not run: it needs client/node_modules,
which this worktree does not install, and the fix it attempted touched
three client files that this change does not modify (reverted). No client
file is in this commit.
2026-11-01 00:36:05 +00:00
dc c033032e26 chore(ci): cover every .npmrc in the hook, and clean up the registry config
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 5m28s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 18m51s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 29m10s
Follow-ups from the review of #414.

The credential guard now checks each staged .npmrc rather than only the client
one: the root and sas/ files are tracked policy as well, so a token pasted into
either was equally one `git add -A` away. Verified by staging a token in
sas/.npmrc - the hook exits 1.

$RUNNER_TEMP/npmrc is removed at the end of each job that writes it, with
`if: always()` so a failed job cleans up too.

The root `install` script is gone: the root .npmrc sets ignore-scripts, so npm
never ran it. CONTRIBUTING already spells out the per-project commands, and is
now the single source.

The release workflows build the published client from the same tree, so they run
`check:archiver` like build.yaml does.
2026-10-31 09:55:31 +00:00
allan b9a1d5ac61 Merge pull request 'fix(deps): follow-redirects 1.16.2 and minimatch 11.0.3 for two runtime advisories' (#414) from chore/audit-follow-redirects into release/7.22
Sites / deploy (push) Successful in 3m55s
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 5m12s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 18m58s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 29m54s
Reviewed-on: #414
2026-10-31 09:52:46 +00:00
dc 761734016d ci: reject a credential in a staged client/.npmrc, and make the guard runnable
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 5m2s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 17m11s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 27m44s
client/.npmrc is tracked now, so a token left in it from the old pattern is one
`git add -A` from being committed. Prose in CONTRIBUTING is not a control: the
pre-commit hook fails when the staged file holds _authToken, _auth or _password.

`npm run check:archiver` runs the directory-walk guard, so it is reproducible
before a push instead of only in CI, and the CI step calls the same script.

CONTRIBUTING now spells out the per-project installs, since the root .npmrc has
ignore-scripts=true and the composite install script therefore never runs.
2026-10-31 09:14:10 +00:00
dc 3f569d3dae ci: pass the registry secret through the environment, and document the local setup
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 5m0s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 17m37s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 27m47s
Four write steps interpolated ${{ secrets.NPMRC}} straight into the shell source,
so a quote or $( in the value would break the step or run. They use the env form
the same workflows already use elsewhere.

CONTRIBUTING.md now says what the tracked client/.npmrc means for a developer:
run `npm run postinstall` after installing, `npx cypress install` for the suite,
and keep registry credentials in the user config rather than in the tracked file.
2026-10-31 05:51:01 +00:00
dc d07151fbf5 ci: keep the registry token out of the tracked .npmrc, harden the archiver guard
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 5m8s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 17m42s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 27m48s
client/.npmrc is tracked now, and every workflow appended the NPMRC secret to it
inside the workspace - one `git add -A` from committing a live token, and
semantic-release runs in jobs that have already written it. The secret goes to
$RUNNER_TEMP/npmrc and NPM_CONFIG_USERCONFIG points the installs at it, so the
project file stays policy-only.

The archiver guard used a fixed path in the shared tmpdir and had no handler on
the write stream: two jobs on one runner collided on the path, and a write
failure surfaced as an uncaught throw. Each run now gets its own directory, both
streams report, and the tree is removed afterwards.

The exceljs override pins archiver to 8.0.0 rather than ^8.0.0, so the version
the guard was validated against cannot drift.
2026-10-31 04:46:11 +00:00
dc 5ca1937ea4 ci: append the secret to client/.npmrc, install cypress explicitly, declare the guard's imports
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Failing after 3m39s
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 5m4s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 27m55s
Three things the last run exposed.

Every workflow that writes the NPMRC secret used `>`, which now overwrites a
tracked policy file - so the release, lighthouse and sites jobs would install
with hooks enabled and ranges unpinned, the opposite of what this PR adds. They
append.

Cypress downloads its binary in a dependency install hook, so ignore-scripts
leaves it out: "The cypress npm package is installed, but the Cypress binary is
missing". Both client installs now run `npx cypress install` after the
generator.

The archiver guard imports archiver and unzipper, which were only present as
overrides under exceljs; they are declared devDependencies at their resolved
versions so the script owns what it imports. Both remain production packages
because exceljs still requires them.
2026-10-31 04:02:35 +00:00
dc c97082e468 chore(deps): track client/.npmrc and run the generator explicitly
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 5m5s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Failing after 4m25s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 18m21s
Dependency install hooks now stay off in client/, as they already are at the root
and in sas/: client/.npmrc is committed with ignore-scripts and save-exact, the
root install script runs `npm run postinstall` after installing, and both CI
installs pass --ignore-scripts and then run the generator by hand. The client's
own postinstall is what creates src/environments/version.ts and the hot icons, so
it has to run - it is third-party hooks that do not.

CI writes client/.npmrc from the NPMRC secret; the second job now appends rather
than overwrites so the tracked policy survives (the first already appended).

The archiver guard reads the archive back instead of checking its size: a matcher
that takes the top-level file and misses the nested directory clears any size
threshold, and that is exactly the failure it exists to catch. It now asserts
a.txt and sub/b.txt are both present.
2026-10-31 03:33:19 +00:00
dc 786d15ab0f ci: make the archiver guard an ES module
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 5m22s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 18m35s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 27m58s
archiver 8 is ESM-only, so require('archiver') resolves through require(esm) and
that exists from Node 22.12 - a supported Node 18/20 would fail the check for a
reason that has nothing to do with the minimatch override. The script is .mjs and
imports ZipArchive.
2026-10-31 03:29:42 +00:00
dc 94220048d0 ci: restore install scripts for the client
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 5m37s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 17m11s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 27m55s
The client's postinstall generates src/environments/version.ts (and the hot
icons), which the app imports - with --ignore-scripts the build fails with
"Can't resolve '../../environments/version'". My local check missed it because
version.ts was already on disk from an earlier install.

So the client keeps its install scripts; the archiver guard stays, which is what
that commit was for.
2026-10-31 03:13:55 +00:00
dc aa5c3f887a ci: exercise the archiver path and install the client without scripts
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Failing after 2m33s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Skipped
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 18m19s
The minimatch override forces a major above readdir-glob's own range, and
archiver's directory() is the only runtime caller of that path. scripts/
check-archiver.cjs archives a small tree and fails if the result is too small to
hold it, so the override is guarded by a run rather than by the install
succeeding.

client/.npmrc is gitignored - it is where a developer's registry credentials
live - so the repo-wide ignore-scripts policy is passed on the client install
steps instead. Verified locally: npm ci --ignore-scripts, the archiver check and
ng build all succeed.
2026-10-31 02:42:14 +00:00
sasjs 7d53ed7b8b ci(server): start the server from npm instead of the release zip
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 4m47s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 19m31s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 29m10s
All four pipelines downloaded `releases/latest/download/linux.zip`, unzipped it
and ran `api-linux`. They now start the published package at a pinned version:

    pm2 start npx --name sasjs-server -- --yes @sasjs/server@3.6.2

and `sites.yaml`, which runs it under nohup, does the same with
`npx --yes @sasjs/server@3.6.2`.

Why: 10.7MB instead of 78.7MB, the same artifact a user installs, and a version
this repository names rather than whatever `latest` happens to be. `latest` also
moved silently on every run, so a red pipeline could not say which server
produced it. 3.6.2 is the first release whose bin carries a shebang; before it
`npx @sasjs/server` could not start at all.

The pin lives in `env.SASJS_SERVER_VERSION` in each workflow, next to the npm
cache step that makes repeat runs skip the download (`~/.npm`, keyed on the
version; `continue-on-error`, so a runner without cache support still runs the
pipeline).

The readiness loops and `RUN_AS=root` are unchanged - the package runs as the
runner's Node 24 rather than the Node embedded in the zip, and the loop is what
tells us it came up. Failure paths now dump `pm2 logs sasjs-server`, the name the
process is registered under.
2026-10-30 17:10:45 +00:00
dc d84a1d50f4 ci(build): run the Cypress suite in one job again, keeping the spec-list guard
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 6m49s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Canceled after 1m17s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
The four shards made the release-branch run red, and the reasons are in the
logs rather than in the theory:

  - every failure was a timeout, not an assertion - "cy.type() failed because
    the center of this element is hidden from view", "Expected
    <div.app-loading> not to exist ... continuously found".  Four jobs on one
    runner means four SASjs servers, four ng serve and four Chromes competing
    for the same CPU, and the app under test starves;
  - upload-artifact@v4 does not work on this runner at all:
    "GHESNotSupportedError: @actions/artifact v2.0.0+, upload-artifact@v4+ ...
    not supported on GHES", so the v3 -> v4 move I made on review advice broke
    the artifact step outright.

Measured, from the one sharded run that did complete: 20m34s wall against 33-35
minutes for the single job, with peak concurrency 3 - so a third off, not the
four-fold the split suggests.  That is not worth a flaky pipeline while a release
sits on it.

Kept from the sharding work, because those parts were the real gain:

  - the spec list has one home, .gitea/scripts/cypress-specs.sh;
  - Build-and-ng-test fails when a spec on disk is not listed, so the five that
    had never run in CI cannot go missing again - and they do run now;
  - videos are zipped and uploaded only on failure;
  - one job means one server, which is also what the guards and the balance
    arguments were protecting.

The shard and fan-in jobs are gone with the branch that carried them.
2026-10-28 19:27:51 +00:00
allan 8e2cce4150 Merge pull request 'ci(build): split the Cypress suite into four shards, and keep videos for failures' (#392) from ci/parallel-cypress into fix/va-parmap-review-572
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Canceled after 10s
Build / cypress-shard-1 (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Build / cypress-shard-2 (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Build / cypress-shard-3 (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Build / cypress-shard-4 (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Canceled after 11s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Failing after 2s
Reviewed-on: #392
2026-10-28 19:01:59 +00:00
dc@4gl.io f7e753863b fix(deploy): strip the embed parameters by name, and scope the timezone runs to the VA specs
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Canceled after 1s
The standalone URL dropped every query parameter whose name started with
va_, not just va_parmap; the names are now enumerated, and a later
parameter with that prefix survives (the component spec pins the exact
standalone URL instead of a substring, so the query surviving is the
assertion, not an accident of the runner's own query).

The timezone runs are scoped to the VA specs, the only specs with local
calendar arithmetic, so the blocking job no longer runs the whole suite
twice more.
2026-10-28 18:58:26 +00:00
dc febfea3e5e ci(build): make the fan-in gate fail, and drop the duplicated blocks
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Build / cypress-shard-1 (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Build / cypress-shard-2 (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Build / cypress-shard-3 (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Build / cypress-shard-4 (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
The gate could not fail.  With needs: on four shards and no if: always(), a
failed shard skips the fan-in job instead of failing it, and a skipped job is
not a failure on the one check branch protection watches - so the gate was
silent in exactly the case it exists for.

It now runs with if: always() and fails on any shard result that is not
success.  The count is checked as well: if the needs context does not resolve on
this runner the step fails saying so, rather than looping over nothing and
reporting green - which is the failure mode a bare loop would have.

Also removes what the last regeneration left behind: the coverage guard step
appeared twice in Build-and-ng-test (so it ran twice) and the shard 1 comment
block appeared three times.  The file is regenerated from fix/va-parmap-review-572
rather than from my own previous commit, which is what caused the duplication.
2026-10-28 18:55:18 +00:00
dc 3580d6e9eb ci(build): gate the shards behind the job name branch protection already requires
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Build / cypress-shard-1 (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Build / cypress-shard-2 (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Build / cypress-shard-3 (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Build / cypress-shard-4 (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Renaming the shards to cypress-shard-1..4 and adding a job named
Build-and-test-development that does nothing but needs all four.

That name is the status check the branch protection rule requires, so the check
now turns green only when every shard passed - a red shard 3 leaves it
unreported and the PR unmergeable, which is the behaviour the single job had.
No repo setting has to change, and adding a fifth shard later means adding it to
needs rather than remembering to edit branch protection, where forgetting fails
silently.
2026-10-28 18:31:27 +00:00
dc bc9e3ae50f ci(build): give the shard lists one home, cover the five missing specs, and guard it
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 7m36s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Canceled after 1m41s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Build / Build-and-test-development-2 (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Build / Build-and-test-development-3 (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Build / Build-and-test-development-4 (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Review found that five specs ran in no shard - coltype-delete-record,
download, embed-va, metanav, submitted-details - and one of them is the VA
embed suite this release added, 454 lines that had never run in CI.  The old
single --spec string omitted them too, so nothing regressed; they were simply
never wired up, and nothing in the repo marked them skipped.

The spec lists now live in .gitea/scripts/cypress-shards.sh, one place, so the
workflow no longer spells them out four times.  A guard step in
Build-and-ng-test compares the shards against the specs on disk and fails when a
file belongs to none of them or to more than one - proven by removing a name and
watching it fail with that file listed.

Rebalanced for the five additions, on test count and spec count together, since
each spec pays a few seconds of startup:

    shard 1  editor, csv, metanav                                    57 tests
    shard 2  excel, filtering, download, browser-info,
             excel-multi-load, hook-programs                         49 tests
    shard 3  embed-va, viewbox, licensing, filter-panel, liveness     43 tests
    shard 4  viewer-labels, row-cell-limits, derived-variables,
             ddl-export, coltype-delete-record, submitted-details,
             startupservice-launcher, stage, full-table-search,
             csv-limited                                             27 tests

24 specs / 176 tests, each in exactly one shard.

upload-artifact moved from the retired v3 to v4; this change multiplies that
step by four, so it is worth not carrying the dead major forward.

Not in this commit: the three new check names still need adding to branch
protection, which needs repo admin.
2026-10-28 18:26:45 +00:00
dc 330448c496 ci(build): split the Cypress suite into four shards, and keep videos for failures
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 7m12s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 20m43s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Build / Build-and-test-development-2 (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Build / Build-and-test-development-3 (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Build / Build-and-test-development-4 (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Sits on top of fix/va-parmap-review-572 (#391) so the two changes to this
workflow land in one order; the timezone step that PR adds to
Build-and-ng-test is untouched.

The development job ran all nineteen specs in one Cypress invocation on one
runner, so its wall time was the sum of every spec - around half an hour on a
green run, with the whole pipeline waiting on it.

Four jobs now, each with its own runner and its own SASjs server, taking a
subset:

    shard 1  editor (55 of the suite's ~148 tests)
    shard 2  excel, filtering, csv-limited, csv, stage
    shard 3  viewbox, licensing, filter-panel, browser-info, excel-multi-load, liveness
    shard 4  viewer-labels, row-cell-limits, derived-variables, ddl-export,
             hook-programs, startupservice-launcher, full-table-search

The split is balanced on test count, not file count: editor.cy.ts alone holds 55
tests, so an even spread of files would leave one shard running twice as long as
the others.  Its own duration is the floor the pipeline can reach.

The setup steps are identical in every shard, so they are defined once and
aliased with a YAML anchor; each job differs only in SHARD and SPECS.  Shard 1
keeps the original job name so an existing required status check still matches.

Video is still recorded - measured at 91s with it and 92s without on the same
spec, so the recording is not what takes the time.  What it did cost was the zip
and artifact upload of every run's videos, now guarded by if: failure().
2026-10-28 18:21:38 +00:00
dc 00257f9160 ci(client): run the client suite in two more timezones
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 20m42s
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 7m8s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
2026-10-28 18:04:01 +00:00
dc ded8bd13b3 ci: drop the HTTP_PORT explainer from the workflows
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 5m35s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 20m49s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Failing after 34m53s
The line that sets it is the change; the four lines above it only restate it.
2026-10-27 16:12:50 +00:00
dc@4gl.io 9aea59dfef ci: start the SASjs Server with HTTP_PORT=5000
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 5m41s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 23m4s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Failing after 34m12s
SASjs Server 3.x deprecated PORT and PROTOCOL and refuses to start when an
.env names neither HTTP_PORT nor HTTPS_PORT, exiting with

    - no listener is enabled
     - set HTTP_PORT and/or HTTPS_PORT (either may be used alone)

The three workflows downloaded releases/latest and wrote an .env without a
listener, so api-linux never bound :5000 and the 'Setup and start SASjs
server' step failed after its 120s wait (build runs for #363 and #365, both
failed there). Add HTTP_PORT=5000 to build.yaml, release.yaml and
lighthouse.yaml, and document it in the local-dev .env in CONTRIBUTING.md,
where the default-port claim is no longer true.
2026-10-27 14:34:13 +00:00
dc 1f1028a2a5 ci(build): give the Cypress suite the time it now needs
Sites / deploy (push) Successful in 3m44s
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 5m8s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 20m14s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 36m42s
The step's inner guard killed Cypress at 30 minutes (exitcode 124) with the
19-spec list still on spec 18, so the job failed without a single failed spec -
seen on a07728b and on the previous head. The suite has grown to roughly 33-36
minutes; the inner guard is now 45 minutes and the step 50.
2026-10-24 23:00:14 +00:00
dc de71b4456e chore: merge feat/derived-vars into the startupservice launcher branch
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 5m43s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 20m45s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 32m14s
2026-10-23 01:46:08 +00:00
dc 40f61331aa feat: run startupservice in a new window from its error modal
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Failing after 1m56s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Skipped
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 19m25s
When the startupservice fails, the modal is a dead end: the adapter returned
no log, so there is nothing to act on. The modal now offers a button that runs
the same service through the JES / STP web app in a new browser window, where
the SAS log is returned as the page body.

`_debug=131` is always added (the log is the point), and `_executionTasks` is
never included, so on Viya the run is not submitted as a Compute task and
cannot hit the execution-task timeout. The URL is built by `buildServiceUrl`,
which works for SAS 9, Viya and SASjs Server, and is the same shape the deploy
configurator already uses to open makedata.

The startup failure modals now carry the service name, which is what shows the
button: all three failure branches (malformed response, missing properties,
request rejected) pass `public/startupservice`.
2026-10-23 01:15:31 +00:00
dc 05ad5544e2 ci: run the derived-variables spec last
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 5m12s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 19m58s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 30m47s
It applies a licence key via loginAndUpdateValidKey, and csv-limited
asserts the free-tier restriction - so it must not run before that spec.
Running last keeps the licence state every other spec sees unchanged.
2026-10-20 00:43:22 +00:00
dc 8e82a7c857 ci: run the derived-variables cypress spec
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 6m6s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 21m7s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Failing after 31m36s
The cypress step takes an explicit spec list, so a new spec has to be
added to it to run.
2026-10-20 00:03:04 +00:00
dc dbc3044a0f ci(hooks): scan for secrets in CI, and add the pre-commit framework config
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 5m44s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 22m18s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 31m18s
Review feedback on this PR: with .npmrc setting ignore-scripts=true the prepare
script never runs, so the native hooks in .git-hooks/ do not activate on a fresh
clone and a commit can go unchecked.

Both standard routes are added, the way sasjs/cli and sasjs/lint carry them:

- .pre-commit-config.yaml pins the gitleaks hook to v8.30.1, so `pre-commit
  install` wires the secret scan without the one-time core.hooksPath command.
- Build-and-ng-test runs the same pinned @nogoo9/gitleaks binary as a step,
  because `pre-commit install` is itself a manual command: CI is the enforcement
  point.  --no-git scans the working tree, so the gate is what the pull request
  adds rather than the repo's history.

The scan runs before the job writes client/.npmrc from the NPMRC secret - that
file carries the private registry token, so scanning after it would flag the
token CI injects itself.

.npmrc is unchanged - ignore-scripts=true stays - and the native hooks stay for
anyone who prefers them.  CONTRIBUTING.md names the framework route next to the
existing one-time command.

Verified: npm ci followed by the scan reports no leaks on a fresh checkout, the
client lint check passes, and pre-commit validate-config plus pre-commit run
--all-files both pass.
2026-10-04 17:47:35 +00:00
dc 3de6655f26 feat(editor): raise the row limits and add a cell limit to the EDIT screen
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 5m22s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 21m58s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 30m41s
VIEW default 500 -> 2000. EDIT default 100 -> 250, plus a new
DC_MAXCELLS_WEBEDIT (200000) so a wide selection is refused on cells as
well as rows, whichever is reached first. Measured end-to-end: 2000 rows
of a 9 column table is ~1s in VIEW / ~6s in EDIT, but 100 rows of a 1001
column table is already ~17s in EDIT - a row cap cannot bound that.

The EDIT guard also moves: it now checks the filtered row count before
the sort that caps work.out, and again after PRE_EDIT_HOOK, which can
replace work.out with a larger table.
2026-10-03 13:15:58 +00:00
dc 1354fced46 ci: set RUN_AS=root so the SASjs Server starts in the runner
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 5m51s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 22m23s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 30m21s
Recent sasjs/server releases refuse to run as root unless RUN_AS names
an account (security hardening, "refuse to run as root unless RUN_AS
names an account"). The CI runners are root, so the server exited at
startup and pm2 restart-looped (103 restarts), leaving :5000
unreachable - which is what failed the mocked-estate deploy and the
Lighthouse job.

The server's own message offers RUN_AS=root as the deliberate override;
opt in explicitly for the throwaway CI container.
2026-10-02 15:31:24 +00:00
dc a0c9349e08 ci: wait for the SASjs Server to answer before deploying mocks
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Failing after 2m59s
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 5m3s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Failing after 6m51s
Both workflows start api-linux with `pm2 start api-linux --wait-ready`
and then hit http://localhost:5000 in the next step. pm2 can return
while the app is still 'launching' (it does not always block on the
ready signal), so the deploy step races the server and fails with
"Couldn't connect to server".

Wait up to 120s for the server to answer, and print `pm2 list` plus the
api-linux log if it never does, so a genuine startup failure is visible
in the job output instead of a bare ECONNREFUSED.
2026-10-02 15:26:04 +00:00
dc 05f3f49e0c feat(system): export the DC library DDL from the system screen
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Failing after 1m47s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Skipped
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Failing after 4m46s
Adds a fourth admin action to the System information screen - Export DC
Library DDL - with a secondary flavour chooser (SAS, PGSQL, TSQL) and an
optional schema box for the DB flavours. The selection is passed to the
existing services/admin/exportdb service in a new window as URL params.

Also bumps @sasjs/adapter to ^4.19.1, adds a Cypress spec for the three
flavour states, and adds a TSQL case to the exportdb SAS test.

Closes #179
2026-10-02 14:03:53 +00:00
dc 60ddb475d7 ci: run the hook-programs spec in the cypress job
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 5m26s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 21m5s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 29m17s
hook-programs.cy.ts was in no CI spec list, so it never ran - the only
end-to-end coverage of the new mock hook execution (mockHookSource plus
the PRE/POST_EDIT_HOOK blocks) and of the loader's target re-registration
check was dead weight. Add it to the development job's --spec list.

It goes second, not last: csv-limited.cy.ts asserts the free tier and so
must keep the first slot (before any spec applies a licence key), and test
2 reads the approval queue, which is paged oldest first - a changeset
submitted by an earlier spec pushes its own row off the first page. The
spec header records the constraint. Full list verified locally: 15 specs,
132 tests, all passing.
2026-09-27 23:28:42 +00:00
allan 10122312cb Merge pull request 'fix(ci): correct server-ci webSourcePath and build the frontend before the mock deploy' (#332) from fix/server-ci-streamweb into feat/browser-info
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 5m58s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 21m46s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 30m0s
Reviewed-on: #332
2026-09-27 19:08:23 +00:00
dc ce1de3d5b4 ci: run the browser-info spec in the cypress job
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 5m58s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 22m2s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 27m40s
browser-info.cy.ts asserts the diagnostics tables on the adapter payload but was not in the job's explicit --spec list, so it never ran. Append it so the feature is covered by CI.
2026-09-27 19:02:40 +00:00
dc a4ad4cba28 fix(ci): correct server-ci webSourcePath and build frontend before mock deploy
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 5m42s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 21m28s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 28m23s
The server-ci target streams the Angular frontend (CONTRIBUTING.md documents
http://localhost:5000/AppStream/clickme/), but webSourcePath was
"`../../../../client/dist". The leading backtick makes the first path segment
literal, so it happened to resolve to <repo>/client/dist by accident; the
correct value relative to the sasjs project root (sas/mocks) is
../../client/dist.

The real problem was that CI job 2 never built the client, so client/dist did
not exist when the mock services were deployed: the deploy logged
"webSourcePath: <repo>/client/dist present in 'streamConfig' doesn't exist"
and streamed no frontend, while the job still passed. Build the production
frontend before deploying the mocks so the streamed app is actually produced.
2026-09-27 18:48:03 +00:00
dc 92bc72f51b ci: run the filter-panel spec in the cypress job
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 5m41s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 22m26s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 28m15s
2026-09-25 14:30:30 +00:00
dc 48599c207d test(e2e): add full table search spec with mock search and filter support
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Failing after 1m42s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Skipped
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 20m16s
The viewer's search box searches every column of a table - character columns
by case-sensitive CONTAINS and numeric columns by exact equality - but against
the JS mock backend the box did nothing, because the viewdata mock ignored
SEARCHTYPE/SEARCHVAL (and FILTER_RK) entirely.

Mock changes (sas/mocks/sasjs/services/public/viewdata.js):
- apply the stored filter first via mpeFilterMaster, mirroring
  %mpe_filtermaster(VIEW,...) in viewdata.sas, and return its WHERE text as
  sasparams.FILTER_TEXT (previously hard-coded blank, so the viewer's info bar
  never showed a clause and the filter was never applied to the rows)
- mirror %mp_searchdata: CHAR = case-sensitive CONTAINS across every character
  column, NUM = exact equality across every numeric column, only CHAR/NUM
  trigger a search, search values stripped of % & ; " like the SAS service
- cap the rows the way the real service does (MAXROWS 500; NOBS is the uncapped
  filtered count for a normal view, the capped match count for a search)
- a search with no matches now returns no rows, so the client shows its
  "No data found with given conditions" panel; the single-empty-row fallback
  stays for the normal-view-empty-table case

Mock data (sas/mocks/sasjs/services/admin/makedata.js):
- new MPE_X_SEARCH demo table: 1000 deterministic, obviously fictional
  deep-sea survey rows, registered in MPE_TABLES. Seeded so a partial search
  hits a value buried in the middle of a long text column, a value spanning two
  columns, a repeated exact numeric, and rows that deliberately do not match.

New spec (client/cypress/e2e/full-table-search.cy.ts):
- seven tests covering open/full view, partial character search, case
  sensitivity, numeric exact match, no match, search within a filter, and
  clearing the search. No artificial waits - state assertions only.
- added to the Cypress spec list in .gitea/workflows/build.yaml

Also adds the dc-cypress skill (.agents/skills/dc-cypress) covering the mock
backend setup, the spec conventions, the selectors that actually work in the
viewer filter modal, and the fixed 1280x720 video capture.
2026-09-16 00:48:12 +00:00
hermes 3b9344cb60 fix: dynamic js mocks
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 5m16s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 21m35s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Failing after 33m28s
2026-08-28 00:35:31 +01:00
YuryShkoda 74c38e1641 feat(stage): add Formatted/Unformatted toggle to the staging page
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 4m53s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 21m0s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 20m17s
- Mirrors the review page's toggle: getstagetable.sas now also webouts
  fmt_stagetable (SAS-formatted), selectFormattedRows() picks between it
  and the raw stagetable, falling back to raw if fmt data is absent
- Adds stage.cy.ts e2e coverage and wires it into both build.yaml and
  release.yaml's cypress --spec lists (previously out of sync with
  each other on viewbox.cy.ts too)
2026-08-03 09:28:52 +03:00
allan 5c56c7579f Merge branch 'additional-validations-regex' into issue-239
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 4m53s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 20m48s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Successful in 19m27s
2026-07-24 13:54:51 +00:00
Yury 7050808d80 Merge branch 'additional-validations-regex' into issue-239
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Canceled after 1m15s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Canceled after 1m17s
2026-07-24 13:54:26 +00:00
4gl 2a771bb91a fix: removing low severity warning in npm audit
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Failing after 48s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Skipped
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Failing after 1m9s
2026-07-24 13:12:58 +01:00
4gl ee3c6c9e0f chore: making fail on npm audit a strict check 2026-07-24 12:53:51 +01:00
YuryShkoda ee4e9b9271 chore: added viewbox.cy.ts to CI tests
Build / Build-and-ng-test (pull_request) Successful in 4m54s
Lighthouse Checks / lighthouse (pull_request) Successful in 22m0s
Build / Build-and-test-development (pull_request) Failing after 21m21s
2026-07-24 13:12:07 +03:00