Files
datacontroller.io/content/feed/sas-special-missings/index.md
T
dc 0ee0b4ea7c blog: NOTNULL now rejects special missings; range rules and formulas do not support them
The validator fix lands in dc/dc (PR #323), so the post describes the fixed
behaviour rather than the mismatch: a special missing fails NOTNULL, matching
a physical SAS NOT NULL / primary key constraint.

Also records what ROUND and SOFTSELECT/HARDSELECT do with one, and groups
MINVAL/MAXVAL/HARDFORMULA/SOFTFORMULA under 'not supported'.
2026-09-23 07:48:44 +00:00

142 lines
11 KiB
Markdown

---
title: '28 Ways to Be Missing in SAS'
description: A SAS numeric missing is not a lone wolf - there are 28 of them, and Data Controller has handled all of them since v4. How they work, and what the validation rules do with them.
date: '2026-09-22 09:00:00'
author: 'Allan Bowe'
authorLink: https://www.linkedin.com/in/allanbowe/
tags:
- Special Missings
- Data Quality
previewImg: './cover.jpeg'
---
# 28 Ways to Be Missing in SAS
A numeric missing value in SAS is not a lone wolf. The ordinary missing (`.`) is one of **28** distinct missing values available for a numeric variable - the other 27 are written with a single character, the letters `A` to `Z` or an underscore (`._`).
They exist because "missing" is usually not the whole story. A survey question that was never reached, a reading that was illegible, a value the respondent refused to give - in a well run process those are different facts, and a lone `.` throws the difference away. Special missings record *why* the value is missing.
## They are numbers, not text
- Arithmetic on them yields missing - `.A + 1` is `.`
- `proc means`, `proc summary` and friends exclude them, exactly as they exclude `.`
- They sort below every non-missing number, in the order `._`, then `.`, then `.A` to `.Z`
- The `NMISS()` and `CMISS()` functions count them as missing
- Converting one to text drops the period - `cats(.A)` is the string `A`
A display gotcha worth knowing: a regular missing prints as `.`, unless `options MISSING=` changes that character - set it to blank and a regular missing renders as an empty cell. The option affects only the regular missing; `._` and `.A`-`.Z` always print as their own letter. So a blank cell in a SAS listing is still unambiguously a regular missing, and a lone letter is still a special one. Data Controller itself is unaffected either way - it sends a regular missing to the browser as `null` and a special missing as its letter.
In a SAS dataset they are written with a leading period (`.A`, `.B` ... `._`). In Data Controller you type just the letter or the underscore - no period - and the letter is not case sensitive. Two letters, or a letter mixed with a number, are refused rather than guessed.
## Carrying them between the browser and SAS
The Data Controller frontend and the SAS backend exchange data as JSON, and JSON has no way to express a letter as a numeric value - `A` is a string. The conversion is handled in the open source [SASjs Adapter](https://github.com/sasjs/adapter#variable-types):
- The adapter infers each column's SAS type from the values it is given. All numeric values means numeric; all strings means character; and a column holding a single character (`a`-`z`, `_` or `.`) alongside numeric values is numeric, with the lone characters written to SAS as special missings.
- `null` becomes `.` or an empty string, according to the type derived for that column.
- Two cases cannot be inferred from the values alone: a numeric column containing *only* special missings looks like a single character column, and a character column containing only nulls looks numeric. For those, the adapter accepts an explicit format for the column - and Data Controller sends one automatically, because it already knows each column's SAS format from the metadata returned by the backend.
- A value that is neither a number nor a single valid character is refused rather than guessed (for example `aaaa`, or `!` in a numeric column), and a literal `.` is refused in favour of `null` for a regular missing.
There is nothing to configure. Special missings are available by default, for numeric cells.
Once in SAS they are ordinary values, so they are what the approval DIFF screen compares, and the DIFF's formatted / unformatted switch shows either the formatted representation or the raw value - useful for confirming exactly which missing was set.
## What the Data Controller validation rules do with them
These are Data Controller's own rules, configured per column in the `MPE_VALIDATIONS` table and applied in the browser as you edit and submit.
- `NOTNULL` - fails. A special missing is NULL as far as a NOT NULL (or primary key) constraint is concerned, so the rule rejects it - and so does a physical SAS NOT NULL constraint on the target table
- `HARDREGEX` - checked against the pattern like any other value; unlike blanks and the plain `.`, special missings are **not** exempt, so a numeric column that carries them needs a pattern which allows for a single letter
- `SOFTREGEX` - the same check, but a failure is only a warning rather than a block, and it is ignored entirely if the column also has a `HARDREGEX` rule
- `SOFTSELECT` - never blocks, so a special missing passes; `HARDSELECT` is a strict membership test and rejects one
- `ROUND` - harmless. It only rounds values that are numbers, so a special missing is left exactly as it was typed
Special missings are **not supported** in a column that carries a range rule or a formula:
- `MINVAL` / `MAXVAL` - a special missing sorts below every number, so `MINVAL` rejects it and `MAXVAL` accepts it while rejecting the column's real numbers. The rule's own value has to be a number too: put a special missing in `MINVAL` and every cell in the column fails, put one in `MAXVAL` and every real number fails
- `HARDFORMULA` / `SOFTFORMULA` - a formula that reads a special-missing cell does not compute; the grid's spreadsheet engine returns `#VALUE!` for that row, where the plain `.` contributes 0
`CASE` (`UPCASE` / `LOWCASE`) is a character rule and does not come into it: SAS hands the browser a special missing as an uppercase letter, so there is no case to enforce, and a `CASE` rule on a numeric column would reject the column's numbers rather than the missing.
One thing worth knowing about the regex rules: although the pattern is written in SAS PRX syntax, the check itself runs in the browser - SAS only parses the pattern (`PRXPARSE`) when the rule is saved - so the two engines can disagree on exotic patterns, and SAS pads a numeric-to-character conversion, so a pattern re-used in SAS needs `strip()` for an anchored match.
In short, a special missing counts as a value for the pattern and dropdown rules, and as a missing value for everything that asks for a number.
`video: [Managing Special Missing Values with Data Controller for SAS](https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/ggrcNr23Jzw)`
The recording shows the full cycle: typing special missings into numeric cells, the rejections, submitting the changes, approving them, and reviewing the DIFF - including a change from one special missing to another, and the formatted / unformatted switch on date and datetime columns.
<!--
LinkedIn version of this post - publish it with the "Managing Special Missing
Values with Data Controller for SAS" video attached. Kept in sync with the copy
above: same points, same claims, same order.
A SAS numeric missing is not a lone wolf. It is 28.
The ordinary missing (.) is just the most common of them. The other 27 are single characters - the letters A to Z, or an underscore (._) - and they let you record WHY a value is missing: the question was never reached, the reading was illegible, the respondent refused.
They are real numeric values, not text:
- .A + 1 is .
- PROC MEANS excludes them, like any other missing
- they sort below every number: ._ then . then .A to .Z
- NMISS() and CMISS() count them as missing
- a regular missing prints as . unless options MISSING changes it - and that option never touches a special missing
The hard part is every tool that is not SAS. JSON has no way to say "this number is a letter" - A is just a string. So a value that is perfectly legal in a SAS dataset quietly breaks in the browser, in Excel, in an API.
We solved that in the open source SASjs Adapter, and it has been in Data Controller for SAS since v4:
- the adapter infers the column type from the values, so a column of numbers that also holds a lone letter is written to SAS as numeric, with the letter as a special missing
- where the type cannot be inferred - a numeric column holding ONLY special missings - Data Controller passes the column format explicitly
- you type the letter on its own: a or A, no period, and case does not matter
How they behave in Data Controller's validation rules:
- NOTNULL fails - a special missing is null to a NOT NULL (or primary key) constraint, and a real SAS NOT NULL constraint rejects it too
- HARDREGEX checks it against the pattern, unlike blanks and plain .
- SOFTREGEX warns instead of blocking (and is ignored if the column also has a HARDREGEX)
- SOFTSELECT lets it through; HARDSELECT rejects it
- ROUND leaves it alone, because it only rounds numbers
Special missings are not supported where a range rule or a formula is configured:
- MINVAL rejects it; MAXVAL accepts it but rejects the column's real numbers
- a HARDFORMULA/SOFTFORMULA that reads a special-missing cell returns #VALUE! rather than a number
In short: a value for the pattern and dropdown rules, a missing value for anything that wants a number.
The video shows the whole cycle - entering them, the rejections, submit, approve, and the DIFF.
#sas #datacapture #mdm #dataquality
Image prompt: Cinematic editorial cover illustration: a large pack of wolves, a
dozen or more, spread wide and moving together across a vast snow plain at dusk,
seen from a low wide angle. One wolf stands apart from the group on the left of
frame, turned back toward the pack. The pack is rendered in cool blue-grey and
silver; the lone wolf catches the only warm light in the scene, a single low
amber sun. Overcast dusk sky, faint falling snow, long soft shadows, generous
empty sky and snow to the upper third so the wide crop breathes. Painterly
digital illustration, muted desaturated palette, soft depth of field with the
distant wolves falling out of focus, no text, no letters, no numbers, no logos,
no watermark.
Constraints: no text, no letters, no numbers, no digits, no symbols, no
captions, no logos, no watermark, no signature, no border, no frame, no collar,
no harness, no humans, no buildings, and do not ask for an exact head count of
28 - a crowded pack reads worse than a dozen clear animals, and the number
belongs in the headline, not the artwork. The no-text rule matters more than
usual here: the subject is letters standing in for numbers, so a stray glyph
anywhere undercuts the cover.
Output: save as ./cover.jpeg at 1.91:1 (1200x627, matching the other feed
covers and doubling as the LinkedIn share card), and set
previewImg: './cover.jpeg' in the front matter above. Do not also embed the
image in the markdown body. Full prompt, variants and rationale:
https://paste.4gl.io/?513711f5bde3610e#9LZCA9xzQHDy3CycXmsWU5AoVNtjBZmPotUHHtHTAerF
Fallback variant if the pack composition comes back muddled: a single wolf
standing alone on a snow plain at dusk, its shadow stretching toward a distant
pack reduced to small silhouettes on the horizon.
-->